grrr. arrg.

in regards to prop 8 (without god): why you gotta stick yo nose into other people's bidness? who cares if they're married/divorced/spending too much time with their inflatable companion?! that's their bidness. as long as this bidness is not threatening your belief in yourself and your wee little world, who gives a sheet.

in regards to prop 8 (with god): why you gotta stick yo nose into other people's bidness? love above all. jesus loves everyone -- even rabid, misshappen puppies. it's not your job to go around judging the validity of someone's life choices as long as their life choices are not destroying (again!) your belief in yourself as defined by yourself and god. whatever god decides to be lame and deemed "hell-able" is up to him, and not you. inability to tolerate sounds more like a ticket to a Really Hot Place, ifyaknowhatimean.

peee essss #1: how is it oh-so-offensive and destroying of life values to be referred to as party A or party B? are you somehow lesser in character and stature than you were before said labelization? why do you even give a sheet about labelization anyway!? it's legal terminology and really should have no bearing on how you view yourself (ooo...the strength of self-perception!!). if you're wimpy enough to feel categorically diminished because of legal paperwork -- child, you got bigger issues to worry about than fighting gay marriage rights.

peee essss #2: halllloooohhh!!!! MARRIAGE WAS CREATED AS A PILLAR OF THE HEREDITARY ECONOMIC SYSTEM. it's roots are found in hereditary economy -- where the ties that bind were built in blood -- and blood, as you know, are found in babies. gay marriage don't result in babies and thus hetero marriage was, so obviously!, the more acceptable choice to legalize contracts between two families of economic means. cuz with trade and moneys comes laws to govern people's greed and thus the institution of marriage gets roped into all the legalese. so yieah, marriage has evolved over the centuries into our current lovey-dovey definition -- but darhlinks, please note that the man and woman clause gets much of its bolster from ancient economic hoo-hah.

peee essss #3: BUT GOD SEZ IT'S WRONG!! are you god?? oh wait you're not!!

peee essss #4: BUT THE BIBLE SEZ IT'S WRONG!! according to a book written by HOOMANS. peeps. homies. bros. old, wrinkly white guys with an agenda. a religious, most likely loving agenda -- but an agenda nonetheless. the only word i believe in is god's and god is in my heart. nobody's been able to pry that open to read it yet, so nyah to you.

peee esssss #5: it's a stupid piece of paper!! maybe i'll be the only one to hold this view, but srsly, fuck labels and pieces of paper. i am who i am and whatever categories anyone (government or otherwise) chooses to place me in is INCONSEQUENTIAL next to my belief in myself and own strength of self-perception. marriage, as with anything else, is what you choose to view it as. and because imma view it in my own nit-picky, persnickety way, everyone else gets the freedom to view it however they want to as well. it's called fairplay. as per what that jesus guy said.